Tag Archives: ramblings

Reconnaissance faciale et fausse bienveillance

Dans la course à l’acception publique de la reconnaissance faciale, certains proposent qu’elle puisse détecter dans une foule une personne souffrant de la maladie d’Alzheimer n’arrivant pas à rentrer chez elle.

“Crowds at the Cauldron” by scalpel3000 is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

Sous couvert de bonnes intentions, ce genre de discours est dangereux. Ce discours pousse une profonde déresponsabilisation collective. Il prend pour acquis ou encourage les comportements individualistes.

Dans une société qui encourage le soin mutuel, la responsabilité d’aider une personne qui ne retrouve pas le chemin de chez soi est partagée. Elle incombe à qui peut, à ce moment et à cet endroit, porter assistance. Ce genre de principe existe depuis longtemps, y compris en droit (cf. l’assistance à personne en danger). Une tolérance, mieux, une reconnaissance doit exister pour celles et ceux qui aident autrui. Ce que ce genre de techno-solutionisme dit, sous couvert de bonnes intentions, c’est qu’il est normal et légitime que nous n’ayons pas à nous préoccuper de la personne qui est perdue, qui a besoin d’aide. Que notre devoir est de continuer à aller au travail, faire des courses.

© Benoît Prieur / Wikimedia Commons

Ce que ce genre de techno-solutionisme dit, sous couvert de bonnes intentions, c’est qu’il est normal et légitime que nous n’ayons pas à nous préoccuper de la personne qui est perdue, qui a besoin d’aide. Que notre devoir est de continuer à aller au travail, faire des courses.

Et que cette légitimité à ignorer les autres membres de la société, autour de nous, y compris celles et ceux qui ont besoin d’aide, est construite dans la structure technologique de la ville même : des machines s’occuperont de faibles, des perdus, des autres. Aucune raison de s’arrêter pour aider la personne perdue, la construction technique justifie, légitime et encourage de rentrer chez soi pour aller regarder Netflix et commander à manger par une appli sur son téléphone.

La technologie comme structure de l’individualisme.
Une raison, parmi d’autres, de s’opposer à la reconnaissance faciale.

Si vous voulez agir, rejoignez le mouvement contre la Technopolice : technopolice.fr/


Note : initialement publié sous la forme d’une série de tweets / toots. Republié ici parce que je ne suis pas le dernier à dire « get a blog » quand je vois des threads intéressants et long sur Twitter ou Mastodon.

I tried Netflix for two months. Then I cancelled.

Even though I have some strong reservations about Netflix’s model¹,  I thought I should give it a go and test it, as most of my friends use it.

It also happened that my Kodi box was messed up and it was taking me too long to get my act together and re-install it, so this was a good occasion to try Netflix.

What I find was a service that was quite far from my expectations. And on the whole, not very enjoyable.

Continue reading I tried Netflix for two months. Then I cancelled.

Les premiers responsables

Commençons par rappeler quelques points.

La ou le prochan·e président·e de la République française accédera à cette fonction avec une adhésion de – au mieux – 18,19 % ou 16,14 % des inscrit·es¹. Nous sommes donc dans un système (électoral) qui permet à quelqu’un qui remporte l’adhésion d’une personne sur 5 ou même sur 6 d’accéder à une fonction où elle représente le pays et par extension l’ensemble de la population. C’est abscons, et c’est le génie du scrutin uninominal à deux tours, aka : first pass the post, dont les défauts sont très bien expliqués par CGP Grey dans cette vidéo :

Continue reading Les premiers responsables

La technologie, c’est ce qui ne marche pas.

Il y a quelque chose qui m’interpelle régulièrement dans la communication de diverses entreprises (et au-delà), c’est leur façon de représenter la technologie.
Je ne parle pas de la technologie de tous les jours, le smartphone, Google et Facebook, l’ordinateur embarqué dans les voitures… non cette technologie là est priée d’être discrète, de se faire oublier surtout, qu’on ne pense pas trop à elle et surtout à ce qu’elle implique.
Ici je veux parler plutôt de la technologie en tant que concept, ou plus exactement comme fantasme. Celle qu’on ne comprend pas (voire qu’on ne doit pas comprendre).

Très souvent, la représentation de ce fantasme technologique passe par la dépiction de versions bancales voire franchement buguées ou datées.

Des hackers et des robots

C’est souvent le cas pour les logos sensés représenter les « hackers », source de fantasmes s’il en est.
Bon exemple, le logo de la série de jeux Watch Dogs, qui est stylisé avec un underscore (ça, admettons) mais surtout, par des lettres affichant de sacrés artefacts de rendu.

Watch_Dogs logo
Image promotionnelle du jeu Watch Dogs, avec logo stylisé

Continue reading La technologie, c’est ce qui ne marche pas.

Back on track

It’s 2016 and I realised I hadn’t updated this site in a long time.

So it’s back up and running, with a fresh coat of paint and an updated backend. I finally moved away from lighttpd and to nginx (after all the cool kids did, 4 years ago) and the site is now secured thanks to a Letsencrypt certificate.

It might not seem like much, but it’s nice to feel like things are moving forward.

Google Hangouts and the all but likely death of Jabber

I like Jabber¹. It’s simple. It works.
I can use to chat from my home computer, from my office computer, from my phone. Or all three at once.
I can use to chat privately by adding some end-to-end encryption (such as OTR).
I’ve used to call a friend when he was in Africa.
I use it to chat with my mum. Privately too.
I use it to chat with my friends.

Correction, I used to be able to use it to chat with my friends.
Lately, I don’t see some of them online anymore. Including some long distance friends with whom it has become an important way of staying in contact.

See, it may come as a surprise to you, but most of my friends aren’t übergeeks. In fact, most of them aren’t geeks at all.
They just use what everyone uses. And what everyone uses these days is Google, and thus Gmail.
So they have a Jabber account, which they call a Gtalk account.
I’ve tried telling them their Gtalk account is really a Jabber account, in the same way their their Gmail account is really an email account. Most of the time it didn’t stick but hey, what the hell, at least we could chat.

Now Google has decided to move all their users away from Jabber and towards Hangouts, their new instant messaging platform.

Now before we go any further, of course I understand the need for Google to clean up their multiple instant messaging apps. Of course I understand that most Gtalk users only have Gtalk users in their contact lists. And from what I understand, you can still log in to your Gtalk account, as the Gtalk service is being maintained for the foreseeable future, whatever that means.

But while, Google is selling this a an upgrade they are passing over the fact that Hangouts is really only compatible with Hangouts, and nothing else.
As if users’ Gmail accounts could only send email to other Gmail accounts.

Continue reading Google Hangouts and the all but likely death of Jabber

A year with La Quadrature du Net

It’s hard to believe I joined la Quadrature a little over a year ago.

The lack of updates on this website is a clear testament of the fact, though.

It feels as if it has been a lot longer, and some of my friends have also told me so. As one can imagine, it has been an intense ride, with many dossiers unfolding at the same time: the Net Neutrality debate, the French HADOPI law and similarly-named administration clinging on to dear life, the revision of the European IPRED directive, the dangerous and infamous ACTA agreement, and the many and ongoing attempts to control and censor the Internet.

But many positive things have also happened: positive proposals for the future of creation funding were synthesised, wonderful projects such as RespectMyNet, a citizen Net Neutrality monitoring and reporting platform, the Political Memory, or the Pi Phone came to fruition. Furthermore, many, many citizens learned of what is looming over the Internet as we know it and our freedoms in this space, and decided not only to keep track of these issues but also to act on them.

To imagine over 2.5 million people have watched a two-minute video trying to synthesise the dangers about ACTA is quite incredible, and to see how in a post-SOPA setting this translated into literally thousands of phone calls to European elected representatives  makes one realise that citizen involvement, beyond being heart-warming, is also vastly efficient.

I can hardly sum up everything I’ve learned, the insight I’ve gained into politics and policy-making at the European level, the understanding of organisations and volunteer communities, the wonderful people I’ve met and the knowledge and expertise they’ve shared with me.

But I will attempt to do so in a few posts in the near future.

Joining la Quadrature!

I’ve recently joined la Quadrature du Net as a full time campaigner.

My role will be to coordinate the community, help build citizen campaigns directing grassroots energy towards existing institutions (both French and European) and assist with fundraising and support.

It’s quite an honour to join one of the most dedicated group of people in Europe fighting for a free Internet and for the protection of civil and fundamental rights online, and I expect to learn many things and gain insight as much as I hope to be efficient in defending our freedoms.

Le Web 2010: day 2

Here is a quick summary of what happened at day 2 of Le Web 10.

A fascinating presentation by Salim Ismail of the Singularity University about the brain, how it controls stuff, what we know and especially don’t know about it.

Before that, Ariel Garten from Interaxon talked about thought controlled computing, using the brainwaves.
The presentation was insightful but felt a little too prepared and unnatural. The opposite from Dennis Crowley of Foursquare.

Talking of which, he came back for an extra Q&A and answered candidly questions from the audience.

Later during the day, it was good to see Mitchell Baker from Mozilla and Matt Mullenweg from WordPress talk and remind the participants of the importance of Free Open Source Software on the web.
I sometimes wonder if they realise most of their infrastructure runs in no small way thanks to FOSS. It seems most of the start-ups are very happy to take advantage of the Free Software offerings, but most don’t practice that approach themselves.
Save for WordPress, whose Matt had this good wording of the situation:

We are one of the only companies here today that makes a living by giving away our intellectual property.

Given the success of WordPress (it powers 10% of all websites according to them), it may have given a bit of food for thought to a few participants.

Matt Mullenweg also called people to pay more attention to the hidden social network, the vast network of loosely federated blogs that still contain more people on or around them than Facebook. If they were to actually federate, one can only imagine the result. But I’m sure some smart people are already thinking about that and working on it.

As for Mozilla, they did a very cool demonstration of an real-time animated city with video rendered on the skyscrapers, all in HTML5. And Mitchell Baker talked about how they plan to make one’s identity a bigger part of the browser. The future sure looks interesting for the web.

The day ended with possibly the best talk (and did he talk) by Kurt Vaynerchuk.

Unrelenting, unabashed, whole, he spoke before a delighted and fascinated audience about the importance of finding what really motivates you in life and follow that as a professional path. His message is a really positive one and his delivery makes it even more honest and interesting to listen to.

All in all an interesting 2 days, some interesting people, some not-so-interesting food (but maybe it’s just France that spoils us) and lots of interesting insight, be it on the web/tech start-up scene or more general perpectives.

Well worth it.